On 12-10-13 11:37 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 23:53 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Is the following comment better?
Presence of any pseudo in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE does not affect value
of insn_bitmap of the corresponding lra_reg_info. That is because we
don't need to
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 23:53 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
My biggest problem is ESL. I should use simpler phrases.
Heh, I'm not sure compiler speak qualifies as English. :)
Is the following comment better?
Presence of any pseudo in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE does not affect value
of
The following patch fixes scheduler crash on a SPEC2006 test because LRA
did not process CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 192362.
2012-10-11 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* lra-spills.c
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 11:35 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
+ /* Call insn might have not references for pseudos besides
+in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE but we don't count them in
+insn_bitmap of corresponding lra_reg_info as they don't
+need reloads.
On 12-10-11 12:56 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 11:35 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
+ /* Call insn might have not references for pseudos besides
+in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE but we don't count them in
+insn_bitmap of corresponding lra_reg_info
