On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 19 May 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 20:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:33:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Would that be a good idea ? For symmetry, I thought
(for op (list)
op2 (op))
should be supported too.
Hmm, but is this really a useful extension? To me it just complicates
the syntax for the occasional reader.
On Mon, 18 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for following (artificial) pattern:
(for op (plus)
op2 (op)
(simplify
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 20:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for
On 19 May 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 20:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015,
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for following (artificial) pattern:
(for op (plus)
op2 (op)
(simplify
(op @x @y)
(op2 @x @y)
generated gimple code:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for following (artificial) pattern:
(for op (plus)
op2 (op)
(simplify
(op @x @y)
(op2 @x @y)
generated gimple code: http://pastebin.com/h1uau9qB
'op' is not replaced in the generated
On 18 May 2015 at 20:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for following (artificial) pattern:
(for op (plus)
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for following (artificial) pattern:
(for op (plus)
op2 (op)
(simplify
(op @x @y)
(op2 @x @y)
generated gimple code: http://pastebin.com/h1uau9qB
'op' is not replaced in the generated code on line 33:
*res_code = op;
I think it would be a
