On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 09:15:00PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Am 11.05.19 um 15:10 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
> > Hello world,
> >
> > this new version of the inlie argument packing patch (PR 88821)
> > avoids the ICE on the test case for PR 61968. Otherwise it is
> > unchanged.
> >
> >
Am 11.05.19 um 15:10 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Hello world,
this new version of the inlie argument packing patch (PR 88821)
avoids the ICE on the test case for PR 61968. Otherwise it is
unchanged.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Ping?
> Le 11 mai 2019 à 15:49, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
>
> Hi Dominique,
>
>> How ever adding the new tests is a real PITA!-(
>> Could you improve the naming scheme for them
>
> What should be the preferrred naming scheme for a
> test that is split? I'm open to suggestions (but also,
> the
Hi Dominique,
How ever adding the new tests is a real PITA!-(
Could you improve the naming scheme for them
What should be the preferrred naming scheme for a
test that is split? I'm open to suggestions (but also,
the naming convention should not matter once the test
cases are committed).
Hi Thomas,
I confirm that the new patch fixes the ICE.
How ever adding the new tests is a real PITA!-(
Could you improve the naming scheme for them
TIA
Dominique
Hello world,
this new version of the inlie argument packing patch (PR 88821)
avoids the ICE on the test case for PR 61968. Otherwise it is
unchanged.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Regards
Thomas
2019-05-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/88821
* expr.c
