On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Am 12.05.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Janne Blomqvist:
>>
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Thomas Koenig
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello world,
>>>
>>> the memory allocation for the buffer in the library
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Am 12.05.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Janne Blomqvist:
>>
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Thomas Koenig
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello world,
>>>
>>> the memory allocation for the buffer in the library
Am 12.05.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Janne Blomqvist:
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hello world,
the memory allocation for the buffer in the library matmul
routines still has one problem: The value of 0xdeadbeef meant
as poison could end up in the
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> the memory allocation for the buffer in the library matmul
> routines still has one problem: The value of 0xdeadbeef meant
> as poison could end up in the calculation of the size of the
> buffer for
Hello world,
the memory allocation for the buffer in the library matmul
routines still has one problem: The value of 0xdeadbeef meant
as poison could end up in the calculation of the size of the
buffer for the blocked matmul.
The attached patch fixes that. Verified with regression-test,
also by