Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com writes:
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 21:52 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
+ mips_dbx_regno[CPRESTORE_SLOT_REGNUM] = IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM;
If even fake registers like these are going to be used, then I think
we should initialise to IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM rather than
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:21 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I'm pretty sure we'll need more eventually though. A quick inspection
shows that we don't set mips_dbx_regno for DSP_ACC_REGS or ST_REGS.
DSP_ACC_REGS in paticular seems likely to hit, although you need to
test with an -mdsp option
Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com writes:
OK, you have convinced me. Here is what I am testing, OK to checkin
once I have run it through the testsuite?
Yeah, looks good, thanks.
Richard
While building libgcc in mips16 mode I found another instance of
dbx_reg_number aborting that the patch to pr54061 did not fix.
This code:
extern void __chk_fail (void) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
__strncpy_chk (s1, s2, n, s1len)
{
char c;
char *s = s1;
if (__builtin_expect (s1len n,
Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com writes:
While building libgcc in mips16 mode I found another instance of
dbx_reg_number aborting that the patch to pr54061 did not fix.
This code:
extern void __chk_fail (void) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
__strncpy_chk (s1, s2, n, s1len)
{
char c;
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 21:52 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
+ mips_dbx_regno[CPRESTORE_SLOT_REGNUM] = IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM;
If even fake registers like these are going to be used, then I think
we should initialise to IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM rather than INVALID_REGNUM in:
for (i = 0; i
