Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Moore, Catherine catherine_mo...@mentor.com writes:
I'm testing a slightly different patch from the one that Steve posted:
Index: mips.md
===
--- mips.md (revision 199648)
-Original Message-
From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:ma...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 8:50 PM
To: Steve Ellcey; Moore, Catherine
Cc: Richard Sandiford; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch, mips] Micromips delay slot fix
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Steve Ellcey
Moore, Catherine catherine_mo...@mentor.com writes:
I'm testing a slightly different patch from the one that Steve posted:
Index: mips.md
===
--- mips.md (revision 199648)
+++ mips.md (working copy)
@@ -703,8 +703,13 @@
We found a bug in the micromips implementation where the branch delay slot
was not getting filled for micromips. You can reproduce this with a program
that just has an empty main function. Andrew Bennett created this fix for
it and we would like to check it in. I am submitting it for Andrew
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Steve Ellcey wrote:
We found a bug in the micromips implementation where the branch delay slot
was not getting filled for micromips. You can reproduce this with a program
that just has an empty main function. Andrew Bennett created this fix for
it and we would like to
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 23:13 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Steve Ellcey wrote:
We found a bug in the micromips implementation where the branch delay slot
was not getting filled for micromips. You can reproduce this with a program
that just has an empty main
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Steve Ellcey wrote:
Sorry, it should have been 'main(void) {return 0; }. Then you get (with
the patch):
j $31
move$2,$0
instead of:
move$2,$0
j $31
Hmm, something must have been missed then from the microMIPS patches
