Re: [patch] [arm] Fix PR60169 - thumb1 far jump

2014-02-28 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Joey Ye joey...@arm.com wrote: Ping. OK for trunk and 4.8? Ok if no regressions. Ramana -Original Message- From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey...@arm.com] Sent: 21 February 2014 19:32 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [patch] [arm] Fix PR60169 - thumb1

RE: [patch] [arm] Fix PR60169 - thumb1 far jump

2014-02-27 Thread Joey Ye
Ping. OK for trunk and 4.8? -Original Message- From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey...@arm.com] Sent: 21 February 2014 19:32 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [patch] [arm] Fix PR60169 - thumb1 far jump Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01229.html introduced this ICE

[patch] [arm] Fix PR60169 - thumb1 far jump

2014-02-21 Thread Joey Ye
Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01229.html introduced this ICE: 1. thumb1 estimate if far_jump is used based on function insn size 2. During reload, after stack layout finalized, it does reload_as_needed. It however increases insn size that changes estimation result of

RE: [patch] [arm] Fix PR60169 - thumb1 far jump

2014-02-21 Thread Joey Ye
OK to trunk and 4.8? -Original Message- From: Joey Ye [mailto:joey...@arm.com] Sent: 2014年2月21日 19:32 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [patch] [arm] Fix PR60169 - thumb1 far jump Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01229.html introduced this ICE: 1. thumb1 estimate