Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-10-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 25 October 2016 at 15:49, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >>>

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-10-25 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 25 October 2016 at 15:49, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >> >>> >> Thanks for your feedback. I had missed removing some unwanted code >>> >> while

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-10-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > >> >> Thanks for your feedback. I had missed removing some unwanted code >> >> while code cleanup. I have updated the patch. >> >> I am not sure if we should move all gimple

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-10-05 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > >> Thanks for your feedback. I had missed removing some unwanted code > >> while code cleanup. I have updated the patch. > >> I am not sure if we should move all gimple parsing related functions > >> to the new file (?) > > > > I think it might be good

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-09-14 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 14 September 2016 at 18:54, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Prasad Ghangal > wrote: >> On 26 August 2016 at 14:28, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Prasad

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-09-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> > PING. >> > >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01837.html >> >> (that was a ping for the C FE maintainers) >> >> Prasad, can you update

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-09-14 Thread Marek Polacek
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > PING. > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01837.html > > (that was a ping for the C FE maintainers) > > Prasad, can you update the git branch with the changes from the last patch you > sent out? I don't think

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-09-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 26 August 2016 at 14:28, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Prasad Ghangal >> wrote: >>> On 24 August 2016 at 15:32, Richard Biener

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-09-09 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 26 August 2016 at 14:28, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Prasad Ghangal > wrote: >> On 24 August 2016 at 15:32, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Prasad

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-26 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 24 August 2016 at 15:32, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Prasad Ghangal >> wrote: >>> On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-25 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 24 August 2016 at 15:32, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Prasad Ghangal > wrote: >> On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-24 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As a part of my gsoc project. I have completed the

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-24 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 23 August 2016 at 21:15, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >> On 23 August 2016 at 02:56, David Malcolm wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:10 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-24 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 23 August 2016 at 21:15, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 23 August 2016 at 02:56, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:10 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >>> On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders >>> wrote: >>> >

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-23 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 23 August 2016 at 02:56, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:10 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >> On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > > [...] > >> >

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-23 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > > On 08/22/2016 10:26 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > >> it has no problems, whereas with the default for gcc 5 and earlier: > >> > >> $ gcc -c test.cc

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-23 Thread Pedro Alves
On 08/23/2016 08:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> I believe that only stage 1 is built with -std=gnu++98 forced, and also >> stage 1 is built without -Werror, so I think you'd need to start with a >> compiler that predates

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 08/22/2016 10:26 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > >> it has no problems, whereas with the default for gcc 5 and earlier: >> >> $ gcc -c test.cc -std=gnu++98 >> test.cc:3:15: warning: non-static data member initializers

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-22 Thread Pedro Alves
On 08/22/2016 10:26 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > it has no problems, whereas with the default for gcc 5 and earlier: > > $ gcc -c test.cc -std=gnu++98 > test.cc:3:15: warning: non-static data member initializers only > available with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 >int field = 42; >

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-22 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:10 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: [...] > > @@ -228,6 +228,12 @@ struct GTY(()) function { > >/* GIMPLE body for this

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-22 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:10:29AM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> As a part of my gsoc project. I have completed the following

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-22 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 22 August 2016 at 16:55, Trevor Saunders wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As a part of my gsoc project. I have completed the following tasks: >> >> * Parsed gimple-expression >> * Parsed gimple-labels >> * Parsed

Re: [patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-22 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:35:17PM +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > Hi all, > > As a part of my gsoc project. I have completed the following tasks: > > * Parsed gimple-expression > * Parsed gimple-labels > * Parsed local declaration > * Parsed gimple-goto statement > * Parsed gimple-if-else

[patch] [gsoc] [gimplefe] GIMPLE FE Project

2016-08-21 Thread Prasad Ghangal
Hi all, As a part of my gsoc project. I have completed the following tasks: * Parsed gimple-expression * Parsed gimple-labels * Parsed local declaration * Parsed gimple-goto statement * Parsed gimple-if-else statement * Parsed gimple-switch statement * Parsed gimple-return statement * Parsed