I personally don't like much this pattern of saving a variable, doing
something and then restoring it.
Right, it's kludgy, so I have only changed the location in the end.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on all active branches as obvious.
2014-07-19 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Your patch hides the caret but the location still points to the
closing brace (so if you use an IDE like emacs this is where you will
go).
Is there a location for the definition? Could we store/pass one to this
point?
Otherwise, would it be appropriate to point to the declaration of the
On 12 July 2014 03:39, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Your patch hides the caret but the location still points to the
closing brace (so if you use an IDE like emacs this is where you will
go).
Is there a location for the definition? Could we store/pass one to this
point?
Hi,
since displaying the caret was made the default, the -Wstack-usage warning has
a strange-looking final part:
stack-usage-2.c: In function 'foo2':
stack-usage-2.c:16:1: warning: stack usage is 920 bytes [-Wstack-usage=]
}
^
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for all active branches?
since displaying the caret was made the default, the -Wstack-usage warning has
a strange-looking final part:
stack-usage-2.c: In function 'foo2':
stack-usage-2.c:16:1: warning: stack usage is 920 bytes [-Wstack-usage=]
}
^
Your patch hides the caret but the location still points to the
