On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/27/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 27, 2013, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
Patch with rename to debug attached.
Tested on x86_64.
Add uniform debug dump function names.
On 3/28/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch is ok as-is.
Committed.
--
Lawrence Crowl
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/26/13, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/26/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 2013 Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/25/13, Richard Biener
On 3/27/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 27, 2013, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
Patch with rename to debug attached.
Tested on x86_64.
Add uniform debug dump function names.
Add some overloaded functions that provide uniform debug dump
function
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/25/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
You add a not used new interface. What for?
So that people can use it.
For use from gdb only?
No, for use from both gdb and internally. It is often that
On 3/26/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 2013 Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/25/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
You add a not used new interface. What for?
So that people can use it.
For use from gdb only?
No,
On 3/26/13, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/26/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 25, 2013 Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 3/25/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
You add a not used new interface. What for?
So that
Lawrence == Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com writes:
Lawrence This patch is somewhat different from the original plan at
Lawrence gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-conversion/debugging-dumps. The reason
Lawrence is that gdb has an incomplete implementation of C++ call syntax;
Lawrence requiring explicit
On 3/25/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
You add a not used new interface. What for?
So that people can use it.
For use from gdb only?
No, for use from both gdb and internally. It is often that folks add
dumps in various places while developing/debugging. These
On 3/25/13, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Lawrence == Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com writes:
Lawrence This patch is somewhat different from the original plan at
Lawrence gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-conversion/debugging-dumps. The reason
Lawrence is that gdb has an incomplete implementation
Lawrence == Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com writes:
Lawrence My model is that I should be able to cut and paste an expression
Lawrence from the source to the debugger and have it work. I concede that
Lawrence C++ function overload resolution is a hard problem. However, gdb
Lawrence has a
11 matches
Mail list logo
