On 22/01/2020 10:04, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/01/2020 23:23, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)"
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:36:32 +0100
Correction, the branch should be named /, so the push
should be
git push vendors/ /
For example, for the ARM vendor,
On 21/01/2020 23:23, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)"
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:36:32 +0100
Correction, the branch should be named /, so the push
should be
git push vendors/ /
For example, for the ARM vendor, the push would be
git push vendors/ARM ARM/
R.
will
> From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)"
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:36:32 +0100
> Correction, the branch should be named /, so the push
> should be
>
> git push vendors/ /
>
> For example, for the ARM vendor, the push would be
>
> git push vendors/ARM ARM/
>
> R.
>
> > will work as expected.
>
On 21/01/2020 13:29, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
This script is intended to create a new vendor branch. Doing so is not
completely obvious if
you are not familiar with the upstream structure, so this takes the pain
out of getting it right.
It doesn't check out the branch locally, but
This script is intended to create a new vendor branch. Doing so is not
completely obvious if
you are not familiar with the upstream structure, so this takes the pain
out of getting it right.
It doesn't check out the branch locally, but does set everything up so
that, if you have push enabled
