On 05/30/14 11:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
PING
This is a change to top-level configure, not libstdc++ itself, so I
need approval.
On 20/05/14 15:59 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/05/14 15:53 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The first part of this patch fixes the PR, we should be adding
tar
PING
This is a change to top-level configure, not libstdc++ itself, so I
need approval.
On 20/05/14 15:59 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/05/14 15:53 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The first part of this patch fixes the PR, we should be adding
target-libstdc++-v3 to noconfigdirs, not libst
On 20/05/14 15:53 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The first part of this patch fixes the PR, we should be adding
target-libstdc++-v3 to noconfigdirs, not libstdc++-v3.
The second part disables the target libs that can't be bootstrapped
without libstdc++.
libcilkrts and libsanitizer use lots of st
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 03:53:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The first part of this patch fixes the PR, we should be adding
> target-libstdc++-v3 to noconfigdirs, not libstdc++-v3.
>
> The second part disables the target libs that can't be bootstrapped
> without libstdc++.
>
> libcilkrts an
The first part of this patch fixes the PR, we should be adding
target-libstdc++-v3 to noconfigdirs, not libstdc++-v3.
The second part disables the target libs that can't be bootstrapped
without libstdc++.
libcilkrts and libsanitizer use lots of std:: stuff.
libitm only uses std::atomic, but in a
