On 03/09/15 13:22 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/03/2015 04:58 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This change would allow including to be used to check for
__GLIBCXX__ and detect whether youre using libstdc++ or not. Howard
Hinnant recommends including that header for libc++ because it has no
other
On 09/03/2015 04:58 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This change would allow including to be used to check for
__GLIBCXX__ and detect whether youre using libstdc++ or not. Howard
Hinnant recommends including that header for libc++ because it has no
other effects in C++.
We could make every header
On 03/09/15 13:22 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/03/2015 04:58 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This change would allow including to be used to check for
__GLIBCXX__ and detect whether youre using libstdc++ or not. Howard
Hinnant recommends including that header for libc++ because it has no
other
This change would allow including to be used to check for
__GLIBCXX__ and detect whether youre using libstdc++ or not. Howard
Hinnant recommends including that header for libc++ because it has no
other effects in C++.
We could make every header include so that
any of them can be used, but I
