On 10/20/2017 02:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:03:45PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> A harder problem is that doing the high/lo_sum splitting in expand
>> inhibits subsequent optimizations. One such problem arises when you
>> have accesses to multiple fields in a
On 10/19/2017 08:03 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> This is the set of nios2 optimization patches that I've previously
> mentioned in these threads:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00016.html
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00957.html
>
> To give an overview of what this
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> This is the set of nios2 optimization patches that I've previously
> mentioned in these threads:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00016.html
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00957.html
>
>
On 10/20/2017 02:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:03:45PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
A harder problem is that doing the high/lo_sum splitting in expand
inhibits subsequent optimizations. One such problem arises when you
have accesses to multiple fields in a static
On 10/20/2017 02:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
This is the set of nios2 optimization patches that I've previously
mentioned in these threads:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00016.html
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:03:45PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> A harder problem is that doing the high/lo_sum splitting in expand
> inhibits subsequent optimizations. One such problem arises when you
> have accesses to multiple fields in a static structure object. Expand
> sees this as many
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Richard Biener
>> How do other targets handle this situation? Naiively I'd have handled
>> the splitting at reload/LRA time ... (which would make the flag
>> to test
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Sandra Loosemore
> wrote:
>> This is the set of nios2 optimization patches that I've previously
>> mentioned in these threads:
>>
>>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> This is the set of nios2 optimization patches that I've previously
> mentioned in these threads:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00016.html
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00957.html
>
>
This is the set of nios2 optimization patches that I've previously
mentioned in these threads:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-10/msg00016.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00957.html
To give an overview of what this is for
The nios2 backend currently generates quite bad
10 matches
Mail list logo