On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:02, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
81764 dnovillo {
81764 dnovillo if (TREE_CODE (type) == BOOLEAN_TYPE)
81764 dnovillo {
81764 dnovillo arg0 = copy_node (arg0);
81764 dnovillo
Hello,
this patch ensures that after gimplification also comparison expressions using
FE's boolean_type_node. As we need to deal here with C/C++'s (obj-c/c++ and
java's), Ada's, and Fortran's specific boolean types, this patch alters some
checks in tree-cfg for Ada's sake, and we need to deal
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
this patch ensures that after gimplification also comparison expressions
using FE's boolean_type_node. As we need to deal here with C/C++'s
(obj-c/c++ and java's), Ada's, and Fortran's specific boolean types, this
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
this patch ensures that after gimplification also comparison expressions
using FE's boolean_type_node. As we need to deal here
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
this patch ensures that after gimplification also comparison expressions
using FE's boolean_type_node. As we need to deal here
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
this patch ensures that after gimplification also comparison expressions
using FE's boolean_type_node. As we need to deal here with C/C++'s
(obj-c/c++ and
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
this patch ensures that after gimplification also comparison expressions
using FE's
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM,
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/5/26 Richard Guenther
12 matches
Mail list logo
