2011/3/18 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
OK.
Jason
Applied first part at rev. 171209. Second part at rev. 171210.
Kai
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/3/18 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
OK.
Jason
Applied first part at rev. 171209. Second part at rev. 171210.
thanks.
OK.
Jason
PING, ok for 4.7?
2011/1/4 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
On 01/01/2011 01:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Well, as here no further agreement was found, I post here the
alternative suggested by Joseph. I am open-minded which approach will
be chosen. I just want to fix this long pending issue.
I
2011/3/17 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
On 03/17/2011 04:46 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
PING, ok for 4.7?
Did you have a response to my comment below?
2011/1/4 Jason Merrillja...@redhat.com:
On 01/01/2011 01:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Well, as here no further agreement was found, I post here
2011/3/17 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
On 03/17/2011 12:08 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
I thought to use here instead of on_diagnostic (which is IMHO fine too
as it indicates for now only that attribute shall be displayed on
diagnostics) affects_abi. I think it makes sense to keep that name
as
