Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)

2016-10-17 Thread Eric Botcazou
> On ia64 I get this regression: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/Wtrampolines.c (test for warnings, line 31) > > Since ia64 never uses trampolines this is probably ok and the test > should be adjusted. This actually revealed a problem: the same regression should have appeared on PowerPC64/Linux (ELFv1 ABI)

Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)

2016-10-17 Thread Eric Botcazou
> On ia64 I get this regression: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/Wtrampolines.c (test for warnings, line 31) I managed to miss it in the test results... > Since ia64 never uses trampolines this is probably ok and the test > should be adjusted. Yes, will do, thanks for the heads up. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)

2016-10-17 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 16 2016, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html >> It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the >> documentation. >> >> As discussed, I'm

Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)

2016-10-16 Thread Eric Botcazou
> this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html > It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the > documentation. > > As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4 parts: common infrastructure, Ada >

[patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4)

2016-09-04 Thread Eric Botcazou
Hi, this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the documentation. As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4 parts: common infrastructure, Ada front-end bits,