On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:18 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 13:12:57 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de
wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 20:16:05 -, dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org
dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
New Revision: 201508
URL:
Go for it. The static 212 is not required as long as the pass shows
up in the right spot in the pass sequence.
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:53 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Go for it. The static 212 is not required as long as the pass shows
up in the right spot in the pass sequence.
Thanks. I checked, and both with and without the hardcoded 212, the
dumpfile for the pass for a foo.c is currently:
