The reason for undefined reference to rand is that it is defined as
static __inline__ in Bionic stdlib.h:
static __inline__ int rand(void) {
return (int)lrand48();
}
So in fact, if you do nm libc.so for Bionic, you won't get the
rand.. which is probably not correct, because it doesn't have
Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com writes:
Still, in C standart it is said that rand is defined in stdlib.h, and
we don't include it in that testcase.
It also says: Provided that a library function can be declared without
reference to any type defined in a header, it is also permissible to
Thanks Andreas, it seems clear now that Bionic rand function is not
consistent with the standart.
--Alexander
2013/8/6 Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de:
Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com writes:
Still, in C standart it is said that rand is defined in stdlib.h, and
we don't include it in
Hi,
The following test case fails to compile on Android: gcc.dg/torture/pr56407.c
/tmp/ccA08Isw.o:pr56407.c:function test: error: undefined reference to 'rand'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Which is not surprising at all, since the testcase has only the
declarations of abort() and
On 5/08/2013, at 10:57 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Hi,
The following test case fails to compile on Android: gcc.dg/torture/pr56407.c
/tmp/ccA08Isw.o:pr56407.c:function test: error: undefined reference to 'rand'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Which is not surprising at
