On February 6, 2019 3:47:19 PM GMT+01:00, Rainer Orth
wrote:
>Hi Richard,
>
>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> >> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c currently FAILs with Solaris as
>(both
>>> >>> sparc and x86):
Hi Richard,
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> >> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c currently FAILs with Solaris as (both
>> >>> sparc and x86):
>> >>>
>> >>> FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-not
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> >> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >>
> >>> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c currently FAILs with Solaris as (both
> >>> sparc and x86):
> >>>
> >>> FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-not (DIE
> >>>
Hi Richard,
>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>
>>> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c currently FAILs with Solaris as (both
>>> sparc and x86):
>>>
>>> FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-not (DIE
>>> (0x([0-9a-f]*)) DW_TAG_lexical_block)[^#/!]*[#/!]
>>>
Hi Richard,
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c currently FAILs with Solaris as (both
>> sparc and x86):
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-not (DIE
>> (0x([0-9a-f]*)) DW_TAG_lexical_block)[^#/!]*[#/!]
>>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Rainer Orth wrote:
> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c currently FAILs with Solaris as (both
> sparc and x86):
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-not (DIE
> (0x([0-9a-f]*)) DW_TAG_lexical_block)[^#/!]*[#/!]
>
gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c currently FAILs with Solaris as (both
sparc and x86):
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-not (DIE
(0x([0-9a-f]*)) DW_TAG_lexical_block)[^#/!]*[#/!]
[^(].*DW_TAG_lexical_block)[^#/!x]*x1[^#/!]*[#/!] DW_AT_abstract_origin
FAIL: