On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Roland McGrath mcgra...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote:
The patch looks OK to me.
Thanks! As I'm still not a GCC committer, someone please check it in for me.
If people would like me to handle the merge
Ping. Anybody going to do this commit for me? (If insteaed someone would
like to add me to the gcc group so I can do write after approval, that
would be fine too.)
Done.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
The top level is not automatically merged between gcc and src. However,
people are expected to merge manually. Normally gcc is considered to be
the master.
Ok. src/MAINTAINERS could be clearer about that.
Ok for src/
Roland McGrath mcgra...@google.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
The top level is not automatically merged between gcc and src. However,
people are expected to merge manually. Normally gcc is considered to be
the master.
Ok.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Ideally I'd like to see a build maintainer approve it. Perhaps I missed
that.
Ah. The src/MAINTAINERS file says, Any global maintainer can approve
changes to these files, ..., which in that context I think includes you.
Ideally I'd like to see a build maintainer approve it. Perhaps I missed
that.
I've got my usual paranoia about command line lengths being stressed,
but I suspect we're already way past the limits on the ones that will
actually fail.
The patch looks OK to me.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote:
The patch looks OK to me.
Thanks! As I'm still not a GCC committer, someone please check it in for me.
If people would like me to handle the merge over to src/ myself, I'd be
glad to do that step.
Thanks,
Roland
newlib has a configure check that works by running readelf on a target
binary. While a native readelf is generally pretty generic and
cross-friendly, it's possible for a build host not to have any readelf at
all. It's clearly the right thing that configure use a target readelf tool
if there is
Roland McGrath mcgra...@google.com writes:
MAINTAINERS doesn't make it entirely clear what the procedure really is for
touching these files. Looking at src/ChangeLog I see both what appear to
be instances where changes were first committed to GCC and then merged over
to src/, and instances
