... the below completes the work, no -std=gnu++0x anymore.
Paolo.
/
2014-10-16 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp: Prefer -std=gnu++11.
* testsuite/20_util/add_lvalue_reference/requirements/
Hi,
I committed the below.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2014-10-15 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* testsuite/20_util/add_const/requirements/alias_decl.cc: New.
* testsuite/20_util/add_cv/requirements/alias_decl.cc: Likewise.
*
On 15/10/14 11:27 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
* testsuite/20_util/add_const/requirements/alias_decl.cc: New.
* testsuite/20_util/add_cv/requirements/alias_decl.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/20_util/add_pointer/requirements/alias_decl.cc: Likewise.
*
On 15/10/14 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
One reason for doing that replacement is that I keep copying existing
tests and then having to change it, and I'm lazy!
Hi,
On 10/15/2014 11:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Index: testsuite/20_util/add_const/requirements/alias_decl.cc
===
--- testsuite/20_util/add_const/requirements/alias_decl.cc (revision 0)
+++
Hi again,
On 10/15/2014 11:50 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
And s/gnu++1y/gnu++14 of course ;)
I'm going to commit the below.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2014-10-15 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
*
On Oct 15, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
... the below replaces -std=c++0x and -std=c++11 with -std=gnu++11.
Seems odd to go from c++11 - gnu++11. Why?
On Oct 15, 2014, at 2:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 15/10/14 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
One reason for doing that replacement is that I keep copying existing
tests and then having to change
On 10/15/2014 07:35 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 15, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
... the below replaces -std=c++0x and -std=c++11 with -std=gnu++11.
Seems odd to go from c++11 - gnu++11. Why?
Because all the new testcases we are committing use
Hi,
On 10/15/2014 11:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
The below takes care of 17-19, the rest over the next days...
Paolo.
//
2014-10-15 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
*
10 matches
Mail list logo