On 19/11/17 02:40 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/24_iterators/operations/lwg2353.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// { dg-options "-D_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS" }
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+
+template
+
On 19 November 2017 at 02:40, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
> The issue submission talks about ranges that have InputIterators
> as their iterator type. Even without any such range types, the added
> test more or less shows that it's draconian to require a ForwardIterator
> in std::next, since it seems
The issue submission talks about ranges that have InputIterators
as their iterator type. Even without any such range types, the added
test more or less shows that it's draconian to require a ForwardIterator
in std::next, since it seems perfectly reasonable to be able to std::next()
an iterator of a
