On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
lild -r is now supported with LTO. When using assembler files or non
LTOed objects inside ld -r objects together with LTO then the Linux
binutils 2.21.51.0.3 or later are needed./li
I think this should be
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
lild -r is now supported with LTO. When using assembler files or non
LTOed objects inside ld -r objects together with LTO then the Linux
binutils 2.21.51.0.3 or later are needed./li
I think this should be GNU/Linux, if anything, but then I also think
we
Gerald, Andi,
thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now.
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 changes.html
--- changes.html25
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now.
And here are some markup fixes on top, that address complaints by
the validator.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
thanks for corrections. This is what I've comitted now.
Here is another small update I just crafted, that makes a stylistic
change here and there, introduces LTO as an abbreviation, adds some
missing articles and spaces,...
Installed.
Gerald
Index:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
lild -r is now supported with LTO/li
Thanks, forgot about this one. This also needs support at linker side,
right?
Only if you include assembler or non LTO code.
Without that it should work with any linker.
Do you
I believe the assembler code only works with HJ's version of binutils
and his BFD ld (not gold) currently. HJ can you supply the minimal version?
Non assembler/LTO should work always.
The Linux binutils 2.21.51.0.3 is the first Linux binutils which
supports ld -r on mixed IR/non-IR
Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz writes:
/li
+ liLink-time optimization improvements:
+ ul
+ liImproved scalability and reduced memory usage. Link time
optimization
+ of Firefox now require 3GB of RAM on 64bit system, while over 8GB
was needed
+
lild -r is now supported with LTO/li
Thanks, forgot about this one. This also needs support at linker side, right?
Only if you include assembler or non LTO code.
Without that it should work with any linker.
Do you know minimal GNU ld/Gold versions that works fine?
I believe the assembler
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Index: changes.html
===
+ liLink-time optimization improvements:
+ ul
+ liImproved scalability and reduced memory usage. Link time
optimization
+ of Firefox now
Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz writes:
/li
+ liLink-time optimization improvements:
+ ul
+ liImproved scalability and reduced memory usage. Link time
optimization
+ of Firefox now require 3GB of RAM on 64bit system, while over 8GB was
needed
+ previously.
Hi,
this patch adds some info on changes in IPA and LTO. Not sure if I missed
something important. Martin, perhaps you could add some example on new
devirutalization stuff?
Suggestions for less lame explanations are welcome :)
Honza
Index: changes.html
12 matches
Mail list logo