On Sunday 2015-01-25 23:10, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Here is a new patch (no change from previous)..
If you could apply it that would be great.
Sure thing. Applied right away.
Gerald
On 01/25/2015 05:04 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Ed,
On Friday 2015-01-02 13:59, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I would like peoples opinion of adding another column to the tables
indicating C++ feature status for C++11 and C++14 that contains the
relevant SD-6 feature macro.
Sure, that makes sense.
Hi Ed,
On Friday 2015-01-02 13:59, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I would like peoples opinion of adding another column to the tables
indicating C++ feature status for C++11 and C++14 that contains the
relevant SD-6 feature macro.
Sure, that makes sense.
I seem unable to commit to wwwdocs.
Could
On 12/30/2014 10:44 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/27/2014 07:56 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I would like peoples opinion of adding another column to the tables
indicating C++ feature status for C++11 and C++14 that contains the
relevant SD-6 feature macro.
Sure, that makes sense.
Jason
On 12/27/2014 07:56 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I would like peoples opinion of adding another column to the tables
indicating C++ feature status for C++11 and C++14 that contains the
relevant SD-6 feature macro.
Sure, that makes sense.
Jason
Greetings,
I would like peoples opinion of adding another column to the tables
indicating C++ feature status for C++11 and C++14 that contains the
relevant SD-6 feature macro.
Ed
Index: htdocs/projects/cxx0x.html
===
RCS file:
