On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:19:09PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > Move the boldred class from gcc-6/changes.html to gcc.css.
> > Introduce boldcyan and boldmagenta classes and use them in
> > gcc-6/changes.html.
> >
> > Index: gcc.css
> >
On 2016.01.20 at 18:38 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self' http: https:
> >>
> >> So either we get the configuration of the web server changed, or
> >> indeed we need to touch all those existing pages.
> > At l
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> And I can commit working my way backwards through all the other
>> changes.html pages over the coming couple of days.
> wwwdocs/htdocs$ find . -name '*.html' | xargs grep --color -e " style *="
>
> shows a bit more inline CSS than changes.html, un
On 20 January 2016 at 17:38, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self' http: https:
>>>
>>> So either we get the configuration of the web server changed, or
>>> indeed we need to touch all those existing pages.
>> At least t
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self' http: https:
>>
>> So either we get the configuration of the web server changed, or
>> indeed we need to touch all those existing pages.
> At least the warning/error/note styles are something that multiple p
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:40:08AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:17:36AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Note, we want to tweak gcc-{4.9,5}/changes.html too, and
> > > there are more colors than just red in there.
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:17:36AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Note, we want to tweak gcc-{4.9,5}/changes.html too, and
> > there are more colors than just red in there.
>
> Yes, I just got tired and need to log off now.
>
> > Also, seems the colo
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Note, we want to tweak gcc-{4.9,5}/changes.html too, and
> there are more colors than just red in there.
Yes, I just got tired and need to log off now.
> Also, seems the colors disappeared also from e.g.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx1z.html
Lovel
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:49:27PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Perhaps we need to use something other than ...
> > and similar, the question is what. It certainly worked well back almost 3
> > years ago when I've added those into gcc-4.9/changes.htm
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Perhaps we need to use something other than ...
> and similar, the question is what. It certainly worked well back almost 3
> years ago when I've added those into gcc-4.9/changes.html.
And interestingly it still does when I download the page and view
it
On 01/19/2016 10:05 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Am I the only one who doesn't see the colors at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html#c-family nor
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html#fortran ?
>
> Firefox 43.0.4 says "Content Security Policy: The page's settings blocked the
> loading
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:42:53PM +, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 19 January 2016 at 19:31, Mike Stump wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Am I the only one who doesn't see the colors at
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html#c-family n
On 19 January 2016 at 19:31, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
>>
>> Am I the only one who doesn't see the colors at
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html#c-family nor
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html#fortran ?
>
> Yes. The darkslategr
On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>
> Am I the only one who doesn't see the colors at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html#c-family nor
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html#fortran ?
Yes. The darkslategrey of the headings is very close to black, but the links
s
On 19/01/16 17:08, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, David Malcolm wrote:
Here's an updated version of the above, which the W3C validator
reports as being clean (fixing various "&" and "<" and a missing
end-tag).
Nice - and a lot of nice changes you implemented since GCC 5!
Am I th
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, David Malcolm wrote:
> Here's an updated version of the above, which the W3C validator
> reports as being clean (fixing various "&" and "<" and a missing
> end-tag).
Nice - and a lot of nice changes you implemented since GCC 5!
> OK to commit?
Yep. I was going to flag "miss
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 10:00 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00250.html
>
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 09:50 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > The attached patch adds information on various things to the
> > gcc-6/changes.html page:
> >
> > * source-range
17 matches
Mail list logo
