On 9/1/22 03:41, Даниил Александрович Фролов via Gcc-patches wrote:
Subject:
Re: -Wformat-overflow handling for %b and %B directives in C2X standard
From:
Даниил Александрович Фролов via Gcc-patches
Date:
9/1/22, 03:41
To:
Marek Polacek
CC:
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"
From
From eb9e8241d99145020ec5c050c918c1ad3abc2701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frolov Daniil
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:55:01 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Support %b, %B for -Wformat-overflow (sprintf, snprintf)
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.cc (fmtresult::type_max_digits): Handle
base == 2.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:42:39PM +0300, Frolov Daniil wrote:
> вт, 12 апр. 2022 г. в 00:56, Marek Polacek :
>
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 02:10:48AM +0500, Frolov Daniil wrote:
> > > Hello! Thanks for your feedback. I've tried to take into account your
> > > comments. New patch applied to
вт, 12 апр. 2022 г. в 00:56, Marek Polacek :
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 02:10:48AM +0500, Frolov Daniil wrote:
> > Hello! Thanks for your feedback. I've tried to take into account your
> > comments. New patch applied to the letter.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > The only thing I have not removed is the
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 02:10:48AM +0500, Frolov Daniil wrote:
> Hello! Thanks for your feedback. I've tried to take into account your
> comments. New patch applied to the letter.
Thanks.
> The only thing I have not removed is the check_std_c2x () function. From my
> point of view
Hello! Thanks for your feedback. I've tried to take into account your
comments. New patch applied to the letter.
The only thing I have not removed is the check_std_c2x () function. From my
point of view -Wformat-overflow shouldn't be thrown if the standard < C2X.
So it's protection for false
On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 12:19:47AM +0500, Frolov Daniil via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello, I've noticed that -Wformat-overflow doesn't handle %b and %B
> directives in the sprintf function. I've added a relevant issue in bugzilla
> (bug #105129).
> I attach a patch with a possible solution to the
Hello, I've noticed that -Wformat-overflow doesn't handle %b and %B
directives in the sprintf function. I've added a relevant issue in bugzilla
(bug #105129).
I attach a patch with a possible solution to the letter.
From 2051344e9500651f6e94c44cbc7820715382b957 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
