On 04/29/14 08:14, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
This hunk in your patch doesn't seem related:
Oops, Sorry. Removed that, and
On 23 April 2014 20:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't attach the patch, I am extremely sorry for the noise.
I am re-posting the mail.
This is a follow up mail to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-04/msg00096.html
I have attached patch that prints the
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 April 2014 20:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com
wrote:
I didn't attach the patch, I am extremely sorry for the noise.
I am re-posting the mail.
This is a follow up mail to
This hunk in your patch doesn't seem related:
@@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ Warn about missing fields in struct init
Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess
C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_sizeof_pointer_memaccess) Warning
LangEnabledBy(C ObjC C++ ObjC++,Wall)
+Wsizeof-array-argument
+C Var(warn_sizeof_array_argument)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
This hunk in your patch doesn't seem related:
Oops, Sorry. Removed that, and re-tested.
@@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ Warn about missing fields in struct init
Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess
C ObjC C++ ObjC++
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
This hunk in your patch doesn't seem related:
Oops, Sorry. Removed that, and re-tested.
@@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ Warn about
forgot to add gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org. Sorry for the double-post.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a follow up mail to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-04/msg00096.html
I have attached patch that prints the warning when passed
I didn't attach the patch, I am extremely sorry for the noise.
I am re-posting the mail.
This is a follow up mail to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-04/msg00096.html
I have attached patch that prints the warning when passed -Wvariadic-macros
(I mostly followed it along lines of -Wlong-long).