Re: Add -std=c18 etc. option aliases

2017-11-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:34:07PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Mike Stump wrote: > > > date on it. If there was no major release with c17, I would ditch the > > c17 spelling and just change it to c18 now. :-) I know, kinda sucks, > > There is no evidence yet of anyone

Re: Add -std=c18 etc. option aliases

2017-11-16 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Mike Stump wrote: > date on it. If there was no major release with c17, I would ditch the > c17 spelling and just change it to c18 now. :-) I know, kinda sucks, There is no evidence yet of anyone using the C18 name. So far, it's consistently being referred to as C17

Re: Add -std=c18 etc. option aliases

2017-11-16 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 16, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > ISO C17 won't go to ballot until December, meaning publication of the > standard won't be until 2018, leaving ambiguity as to whether people > will end up referring to the standard as C17, as it's currently known > and

Add -std=c18 etc. option aliases

2017-11-16 Thread Joseph Myers
ISO C17 won't go to ballot until December, meaning publication of the standard won't be until 2018, leaving ambiguity as to whether people will end up referring to the standard as C17, as it's currently known and which corresponds to the __STDC_VERSION__ value, or C18 based on the publication