On 11/27/13 01:02, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.11.20 at 15:43 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2013.11.20 at 14:41 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Note that you need to regenerate all users of libtool.m4. Please post a
patch _with_ the regeneration so that whoever applies it won't screw
On 2013.11.20 at 15:43 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.11.20 at 14:41 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Note that you need to regenerate all users of libtool.m4. Please post a
> > patch _with_ the regeneration so that whoever applies it won't screw up.
Ping.
Can you please have look, Pa
On 2013.11.20 at 14:41 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 20/11/2013 08:23, Markus Trippelsdorf ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > now that slim-lto objects are enabled by default, it would be nice to
> > use them when building gcc with bootstrap-lto. The following patch
> > implements the handling of thes
Il 20/11/2013 08:23, Markus Trippelsdorf ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> now that slim-lto objects are enabled by default, it would be nice to
> use them when building gcc with bootstrap-lto. The following patch
> implements the handling of these objects in gcc's build machinery.
> (Once -fuse-linker-plugin
Hi,
now that slim-lto objects are enabled by default, it would be nice to
use them when building gcc with bootstrap-lto. The following patch
implements the handling of these objects in gcc's build machinery.
(Once -fuse-linker-plugin is made the default, -ffat-lto-objects in
config/bootstrap-lto.m
