Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:51:08PM +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 6 February 2014 22:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 16c51a8..958c667
On 6 February 2014 22:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 16c51a8..958c667 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -1187,14 +1187,10 @@
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:51:08PM +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 6 February 2014 22:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 16c51a8..958c667 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote:
Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
end. If go-torture-execute took a list of sources as
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana@googlemail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@linaro.org wrote:
Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
end. If
Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
end. If go-torture-execute took a list of sources as c-torture-execute
does, then I think adding something like this to aapcs64.exp would work:
# Test
Am 17.01.2014 19:50, schrieb Yufeng Zhang:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the fix. The patch looks OK to me in general, although I have some
minor comments below.
On 01/17/14 08:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Hi, as discussed inhttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
GCC currently
On 17/01/14 23:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor i...@golang.org writes:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, Yufeng Zhang yufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
Also can you please try to add some new
Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com writes:
On 17/01/14 23:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor i...@golang.org writes:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, Yufeng Zhang yufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
Michael == Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@linaro.org writes:
My preferred languages for these tests would be (in approximate order)
c, c++, fortran, java, ada, go. That order is based on which languages
are tested most by users.
Michael Well of course it cannot be done in C or C++. A
Hi, as discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
GCC currently gets a detail of the AArch64 ABI wrong: arrays are not
always passed by reference. Fortunately the fix is rather easy...
I guess this is an ABI break but my understand there has been no release
of GCC which
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the fix. The patch looks OK to me in general, although I
have some minor comments below.
On 01/17/14 08:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Hi, as discussed inhttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
GCC currently gets a detail of the AArch64 ABI wrong: arrays
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, Yufeng Zhang yufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
Also can you please try to add some new test(s)? It may not be that
straightforward to add non-C/C++ tests, but give it a try.
Can you
Ian Lance Taylor i...@golang.org writes:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, Yufeng Zhang yufeng.zh...@arm.com wrote:
Also can you please try to add some new test(s)? It may not be that
straightforward to add
14 matches
Mail list logo
