Re: C++ (RFC) PATCH fix for PR55076 and PR53921

2012-11-02 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2012.10.27 at 09:02 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: The problem here is that we end up with an INDIRECT_REF TREE_CODE with a null TREE_TYPE in lvalue_kind. Is this possible at that point, or does it point to a deeper underlying problem? It looks like there is indeed a deeper problem. See

C++ (RFC) PATCH fix for PR55076 and PR53921

2012-10-27 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
The problem here is that we end up with an INDIRECT_REF TREE_CODE with a null TREE_TYPE in lvalue_kind. Is this possible at that point, or does it point to a deeper underlying problem? Bootstraped and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. 2012-10-27 Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de