On 6/11/19 3:59 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 03:05:26PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/11/19 2:28 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:37:27AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/11/19 7:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Ma
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 03:05:26PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/11/19 2:28 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:37:27AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 6/11/19 7:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > >
On 6/11/19 2:28 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:37:27AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/11/19 7:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
This test segvs since r269078, this hunk in particular:
@@ -4581,8 +4713,9 @@ cxx_eva
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:37:27AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/11/19 7:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > This test segvs since r269078, this hunk in particular:
> > >
> > > @@ -4581,8 +4713,9 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression
On 6/11/19 7:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
This test segvs since r269078, this hunk in particular:
@@ -4581,8 +4713,9 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx,
tree t,
break;
case SIZEOF_EXPR:
- r
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This test segvs since r269078, this hunk in particular:
>
> @@ -4581,8 +4713,9 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx,
> tree t,
>break;
>
> case SIZEOF_EXPR:
> - r = fold_sizeof_expr (t);
> -
This test segvs since r269078, this hunk in particular:
@@ -4581,8 +4713,9 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx,
tree t,
break;
case SIZEOF_EXPR:
- r = fold_sizeof_expr (t);
- VERIFY_CONSTANT (r);
+ r = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, fold_sizeo
