On 9/23/19 12:06 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:17:00AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 9/22/19 3:23 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ /* Informally, two types are similar if, ignoring top-level cv-qualification:
+ * they are the same type; or
+ * they are both pointers,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:17:00AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/22/19 3:23 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > + /* Informally, two types are similar if, ignoring top-level
> > cv-qualification:
> > + * they are the same type; or
> > + * they are both pointers, and the pointed-to types
On 9/22/19 3:23 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ /* Informally, two types are similar if, ignoring top-level cv-qualification:
+ * they are the same type; or
+ * they are both pointers, and the pointed-to types are similar; or
+ * they are both pointers to member of the same class, and
I came across this DR while looking into P0388R4 and realized I need to
implement
it before tackling P0388R4. DR 2352 changes the definitions of
reference-related
(so that it uses "similar type" instead of "same type") and of
reference-compatible
(use a standard conversion sequence), and then
