OK.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> In both these PRs the problem is the same: we have a non-dependent incomplete
> postfix expression in a template, and since r245223 we treat it as dependent
> (with a pedwarn), and erase its type. For OVERLOADs
In both these PRs the problem is the same: we have a non-dependent incomplete
postfix expression in a template, and since r245223 we treat it as dependent
(with a pedwarn), and erase its type. For OVERLOADs this is bad because we'll
hit
this in tsubst_copy:
case OVERLOAD:
/* An