On 08/25/2014 03:15 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Another ICE
Fixed:
Jason
commit 351ac0a147cbfe01e4f8b13a79432d3f37f42caa
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon Aug 25 20:29:21 2014 -0400
* pt.c (check_explicit_specialization): Don't complain about
non-template variable.
(templat
On 08/25/2014 03:15 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
should we just add these test-for-valid cases as new
tests? Or should they become
bug reports instead? Please advise how to best handle these.
Bug reports, please. Or perhaps multiple testcases on one bug report,
for now. :)
Jason
On 25 August 2014 17:08, wrote:
>> Anyway, here's a fix for your recent test.
>
> Thanks, I'll take a look at the tests and will send a patch if something
> seems missing; static member variable templates of a class template and
> explicit specializations thereof are the likely starting point.
On Mon Aug 25 2014 15:47:26 GMT+0300 (EEST), Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 08/25/2014 05:24 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> > Well, it's a bit premature to add tests when the implementation itself is
> > not
> > quite complete, I guess. :) Having ICEs makes it hard to add tests, too. :P
>
> But test
On 08/25/2014 05:24 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Well, it's a bit premature to add tests when the implementation itself is not
quite complete, I guess. :) Having ICEs makes it hard to add tests, too. :P
But tests are how you verify that the implementation is complete.
Anyway, here's a fix for
On 25 August 2014 05:54, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 08/23/2014 06:29 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>>
>> Based on my quick tests with it, it seems to me that we need more
>> tests for static member variable templates. My first attempt at something
>> like that gave an ICE...
>
>
> Yeah, I figured th
On 08/23/2014 06:29 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Based on my quick tests with it, it seems to me that we need more
tests for static member variable templates. My first attempt at something
like that gave an ICE...
Yeah, I figured there would be more to do. More tests are welcome. :)
Jason
Based on my quick tests with it, it seems to me that we need more
tests for static member variable templates. My first attempt at something
like that gave an ICE...
Since nobody else seemed to be working on finishing up variable template
support, I've gone ahead and done it. There were only a few tweaks needed.
For the pr59638.C issue, I'm throwing away the implicit template
parameter list before we call start_decl so we don't actually create an
implicit
