On 08/10/12 11:24, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Richard,
attached patch checks that unlinked uses do not contain ssa-names when
renaming.
This assert triggers when compiling (without the fix) the PR54735 example.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 08/10/12 11:24, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Richard,
attached patch checks that unlinked uses do not contain ssa-names when
renaming.
This
On 16-10-14 10:14, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 08/10/12 11:24, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Richard,
attached patch checks that unlinked uses do not
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 16-10-14 10:14, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com
wrote:
On 08/10/12 11:24, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Tom de Vries
On 16-10-14 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
Richard,
I've implemented the changes listed above, and also made the message a bit
more verbose:
...
kernels-2.c: In function ‘main’:
kernels-2.c:41:5: error: statement uses released SSA name
for (COUNTERTYPE ii = 0; ii N; ii++)
^
# .MEM_57
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 16-10-14 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
Richard,
I've implemented the changes listed above, and also made the message a
bit
more verbose:
...
kernels-2.c: In function ‘main’:
kernels-2.c:41:5: error: statement
On 10/16/14 06:11, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 16-10-14 10:14, Richard Biener wrote:
I've tried to implement the 'light verification pass' you
describe above, and I've checked that the error in my patch is
found, also when I remove the trigger for the verification error
from my patch.
Bootstrapped
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Richard,
attached patch checks that unlinked uses do not contain ssa-names when
renaming.
This assert triggers when compiling (without the fix) the PR54735 example.
AFAIU, it was due to chance that we caught the
Richard,
attached patch checks that unlinked uses do not contain ssa-names when renaming.
This assert triggers when compiling (without the fix) the PR54735 example.
AFAIU, it was due to chance that we caught the PR54735 bug by hitting the
verification failure, because the new vdef introduced by
