On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:32 PM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >
> > > > > +/* Return true if T is a pointer pointing to memory location that is
> > > > > local
> > > > > + for the function (that means, dead after return) or read-only. */
> >
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > > +/* Return true if T is a pointer pointing to memory location that is
> > > > local
> > > > + for the function (that means, dead after return) or read-only. */
> > > > +
> > > > +bool
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > > +/* Return true if T is a pointer pointing to memory location that is
> > > local
> > > + for the function (that means, dead after return) or read-only. */
> > > +
> > > +bool
> > > +points_to_local_or_readonly_memory_p (tree t)
> >
> > +/* Return true if T is a pointer pointing to memory location that is local
> > + for the function (that means, dead after return) or read-only. */
> > +
> > +bool
> > +points_to_local_or_readonly_memory_p (tree t)
> > +{
> > + /*if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (t)))
> > +return false;
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:44 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Hi,
> this is first of cleanup patches for mod-ref interfaces. It removes code
> duplication between ipa-pure-const and ipa-modref that both wants to check
> whether given memory access can interfere with memory acesses before function
>
Hi,
this is first of cleanup patches for mod-ref interfaces. It removes code
duplication between ipa-pure-const and ipa-modref that both wants to check
whether given memory access can interfere with memory acesses before function
call or after function return.
I pulled the logic out to
