On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:15 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Nathan Sidwell writes:
>
>> Let's at least deprecate it. I attach a patch to do so. With the
>> patch, you'll get a note about dbx being deprecated whenever you use
>> stabs debugging on a system that prefers stabs
On 07/21/2017 01:07 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> [darwin, cygwin, rx maintainers, you might have an opinion]
> Let's at least deprecate it. I attach a patch to do so. With the
> patch, you'll get a note about dbx being deprecated whenever you use
> stabs debugging on a system that prefers stabs
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 20:54, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> It ought to be already, in fact anything (powerpc*/x86/x86-64) >= Darwin9
>> (OS X 10.5) ought to be defaulting to DWARF already, will check
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> It ought to be already, in fact anything (powerpc*/x86/x86-64) >= Darwin9 (OS
> X 10.5) ought to be defaulting to DWARF already, will check that sometime.
Yes, they do default to dwarf2. The comments say pre-darwin9
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 20:10, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 6:07 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>
>> [Darwin, cygwin, rx maintainers, you might have an opinion]
>
> darwin going forward is a DWARF platform, so, shouldn't be a heartache for
> real
On Jul 21, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> There is also the matter of SDB_DEBUG which is still supported, and is
> no longer used by anyone, as we have already deprecated all of the
> COFF targets that were using it. SDB support for C++ is even worse
> than the DBX
On Jul 21, 2017, at 6:07 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> [darwin, cygwin, rx maintainers, you might have an opinion]
darwin going forward is a DWARF platform, so, shouldn't be a heartache for real
folks. For ancient machines, ancient compilers might be a requirement.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 7:15 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> AIX still uses DBX as the primary debugging format. AIX supports
> DWARF but the AIX toolchain does not fully interoperate with DWARF
> generated by GCC.
We could still deprecate DBX_DEBUG while leaving XCOFF_DEBUG
> Nathan Sidwell writes:
> Let's at least deprecate it. I attach a patch to do so. With the
> patch, you'll get a note about dbx being deprecated whenever you use
> stabs debugging on a system that prefers stabs (thus both -g and -gstabs
> will warn). On systems where stabs is not
On 07/21/2017 09:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+#ifndef DBX_DEBBUG_OK
^^^
typo? The patch doesn't define this anywhere - I suggest to add it to
defaults.h
as 0 and use #if? Also would need
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> [darwin, cygwin, rx maintainers, you might have an opinion]
>
> On 07/21/2017 01:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On July 21, 2017 12:03:58 AM GMT+02:00, Jim Wilson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 20,
[darwin, cygwin, rx maintainers, you might have an opinion]
On 07/21/2017 01:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On July 21, 2017 12:03:58 AM GMT+02:00, Jim Wilson
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
With this patch the gdb stabs
12 matches
Mail list logo