Hi Jakub,
On Wednesday 2014-11-12 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
Ok for CVS?
I've fallen a bit behind with GCC patches, sorry.
What do you think about this follow-up patch on top of yours?
Gerald
Index: changes.html
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Jakub,
On Wednesday 2014-11-12 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
Ok for CVS?
I've fallen a bit behind with GCC patches, sorry.
What do you think about this
Hi!
This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
Ok for CVS?
--- gcc-5/changes.html 27 Oct 2014 18:05:26 - 1.20
+++ gcc-5/changes.html 12 Nov 2014 13:09:01 -
@@ -84,7 +84,36 @@
of the standard directive code#include/code
and the extension
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
This patch mentions __builtin_*_overflow in gcc-5/changes.html.
Ok for CVS?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
--- gcc-5/changes.html 27 Oct 2014 18:05:26 - 1.20
+++ gcc-5/changes.html 12 Nov 2014 13:09:01 -
@@
On 12 Nov 2014, at 14:13, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
+ size_t sz;
+ if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, amp;sz)
Missing right parenthesis ?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On 12 Nov 2014, at 14:13, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
+ size_t sz;
+ if (__builtin_mul_overflow (x, y, amp;sz)
Missing right parenthesis ?
Thanks, fixed.
Jakub
