On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:41 AM Richard Sandiford <
richard.sandif...@linaro.org> wrote:
> In this PR, SLP failed to include a comparison node in the SLP
> tree and so marked the node as external. It then went on to call
> vect_is_simple_use on the comparison with its STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE
> still
In this PR, SLP failed to include a comparison node in the SLP
tree and so marked the node as external. It then went on to call
vect_is_simple_use on the comparison with its STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE
still claiming that it was an internal definition.
We already avoid that for vect_analyze_stmt by tempo