Hi!
On 2019-04-15T13:55:39+0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:59 PM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> this patch fixes false warning that is output when different -std
>> settings are used. In this case C++ FE produces same declaration in
>> different representations which differ by 0
> Le 16 avr. 2019 à 15:07, Jakub Jelinek a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> The test causes
>>>
>>> WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-do
>>> WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-options in primary source file
>>>
>>> This is fix
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > The test causes
> >
> > WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-do
> > WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-options in primary source file
> >
> > This is fixed by the following patch
> >
> > --- ../_clean/gcc/testsui
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:51 PM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > The test causes
> >
> > WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-do
> > WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-options in primary source file
> >
> > This is fixed by the following patch
> >
> > --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/l
> Hi Jan,
>
> The test causes
>
> WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-do
> WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-options in primary source file
>
> This is fixed by the following patch
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr89358_0.C2019-04-15
> 00:04:48.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/tes
Hi Jan,
The test causes
WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-do
WARNING: lto.exp does not support dg-options in primary source file
This is fixed by the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr89358_0.C 2019-04-15
00:04:48.0 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr89
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:59 PM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Hi,
> this patch fixes false warning that is output when different -std
> settings are used. In this case C++ FE produces same declaration in
> different representations which differ by 0 sized fileds only.
> The patch makes them to be ignore
Hi,
this patch fixes false warning that is output when different -std
settings are used. In this case C++ FE produces same declaration in
different representations which differ by 0 sized fileds only.
The patch makes them to be ignored (and I checked we ignore them for
canonical type merging too)
