Re: [PING] Fix size of static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c

> On 20 Dec 2021, at 16:32, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 12/17/2021 4:21 AM, Olivier Hainque via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583222.html >> >> please ? >> >> Thanks in advance! > OK for the trunk. > Sorry it got lost

Re: [PING] Fix size of static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c

On 12/17/2021 4:21 AM, Olivier Hainque via Gcc-patches wrote: Hello, Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583222.html please ? Thanks in advance! OK for the trunk.  Sorry it got lost. jeff

[PING] Fix size of static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c

Hello, Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583222.html please ? Thanks in advance! With Kind Regards, Olivier > On 3 Nov 2021, at 15:54, Olivier Hainque wrote: > > Hello, > > This fixes the definition of the "p" static array in > gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c to a

Fix size of static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c

Hello, This fixes the definition of the "p" static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c to accommodate the number of strides performed by foo() for s == 78, which will be 129 and not 128 since 1 / 78 > 128. This fixes a failure of the test we first observed in-house on a x86_64-elf run, where