On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 09:58 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 12:42 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > The patch also adds me a maintainer of gdbhooks.py into the MAINTAINERS
> > file. (There doesn't seem to be any sort order to the maintainer part
> > of that file, should there be?)
> >
> > Finall
> "David" == David Malcolm writes:
David> Is there a precanned event provided by gdb that I can connect to for
David> when the underlying code has changed and my caches need to be
David> invalidated?
Maybe not :(
You could use the "exited" event as a decent approximation.
Also, and I think
On 08/26/2013 12:42 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
The patch also adds me a maintainer of gdbhooks.py into the MAINTAINERS
file. (There doesn't seem to be any sort order to the maintainer part
of that file, should there be?)
Finally, I added a copyright header to the new file ("part of GCC", FSF
assi
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 13:56 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 07:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
> > quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
> > pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 15:01 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "David" == David Malcolm writes:
>
> Tom> Naughty.
>
> David> We chatted about this at Cauldron; I haven't yet had a chance to
> David> implement the magic bullet approach we discussed there. In the
> David> meantime, is there a API I
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 15:01 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "David" == David Malcolm writes:
[...]
> David> How would one go about toggling the enabledness of a prettyprinter? Is
> David> this something that can only be done from python?
>
> You can use "enable pretty-printer" and "disable pre
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:48:43PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
> quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
> pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++ for
> printing better representatio
> "David" == David Malcolm writes:
Tom> Naughty.
David> We chatted about this at Cauldron; I haven't yet had a chance to
David> implement the magic bullet approach we discussed there. In the
David> meantime, is there a API I can call to determine how safe this kludge
David> is?
Not right n
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 08:26 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "David" == David Malcolm writes:
>
> David> GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
> David> quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
> David> pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use w
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 03:45:57PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> In this specific instance I was referring to getting meaningful data
> out of gdb when I do something like "p bb" or "p e" for a block and
> edge respectively.
>
> Printing the pointer is useful, but printing information about the
> actua
On 08/19/2013 03:28 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
I assume you mean basic blocks and edges? For that, you can already
use the CFG pretty printers with a file attached to a pipe and sent
through XDot (http://code.google.com/p/jrfonseca/wiki/XDot) which is
written in Python and quite easy to integrat
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 07:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
>> quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
>> pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++
On 08/02/2013 07:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++ for
printing better representations of STL containers.
So as I
> "David" == David Malcolm writes:
David> GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
David> quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
David> pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++ for
David> printing better representations of S
GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++ for
printing better representations of STL containers.
I've written debug hooks for when the inferior proces
15 matches
Mail list logo
