On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This is a combination of my son's work as well as my own.
Congratulations to Austin for this achievement!
Maciej
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Current cc0 head-count is down to avr, cr16, h8300, vax, with
> two of them recently having patches posted, alas not a lot of
> ports left to try this advice.
Hmm, the VAX port surely did not qualify for an innovative approach
anyway (though
> On Nov 25, 2020, at 5:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
>>> I'm intested in any notes, however vague, on that matter. I was
>>> a bit surprised to see that myself...that is, after fixing
>>> *some* related regressions, like the one in
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I'm intested in any notes, however vague, on that matter. I was
> > a bit surprised to see that myself...that is, after fixing
> > *some* related regressions, like the one in combine. (Did I
> > actually miss something?)
>
> My recollection for the
On 11/24/20 4:08 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I'm intested in any notes, however vague, on that matter. I was
>> a bit surprised to see that myself...that is, after fixing
>> *some* related regressions, like the one in combine. (Did I
>> actually miss something?)
> My recollection for the
> I'm intested in any notes, however vague, on that matter. I was
> a bit surprised to see that myself...that is, after fixing
> *some* related regressions, like the one in combine. (Did I
> actually miss something?)
My recollection for the Visium port would align with what Jeff saw but, on the
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/23/20 9:49 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> This is the primary patch for cc0 removal on the H8 port.? It doesn't
> >> have any of the optimization work and many patterns are simply disabled
>
On 11/23/20 9:49 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> This is the primary patch for cc0 removal on the H8 port.? It doesn't
>> have any of the optimization work and many patterns are simply disabled
>> at this time.? It's working well enough to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This is the primary patch for cc0 removal on the H8 port.? It doesn't
> have any of the optimization work and many patterns are simply disabled
> at this time.? It's working well enough to not regress the testsuite.
>
> The H8 is similar to
