On Wed, 23 Aug 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > We seem to peel one iteration for no good reason. The loop is
> > a do-while loop already. The key is we see the first iteration
> > exit condition is known not taken and then:
> Hi,
> this is patch fixing wrong return value in
> We seem to peel one iteration for no good reason. The loop is
> a do-while loop already. The key is we see the first iteration
> exit condition is known not taken and then:
Hi,
this is patch fixing wrong return value in should_duplicate_loop_header_p.
Doing so uncovered suboptimal decisions on
>
> We seem to peel one iteration for no good reason. The loop is
> a do-while loop already. The key is we see the first iteration
> exit condition is known not taken and then:
>
> Registering value_relation (path_oracle) (iter.24_6 > iter.24_5) (root:
> bb2)
> Stmt is static (constant
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 5:18?PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > loop-ch currently does analysis using ranger for all loops to identify
> > > candidates and then follows by phase
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 5:18 PM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > loop-ch currently does analysis using ranger for all loops to identify
> > candidates and then follows by phase where headers are duplicated (which
> > breaks SSA and
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 9:10 AM Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> this patch makes tree-ssa-loop-ch to understand if-combined conditionals
> (which
> are quite common) and remove the IV-derived heuristics. That heuristics is
> quite dubious because every variable with PHI in header
Hi,
this patch makes tree-ssa-loop-ch to understand if-combined conditionals (which
are quite common) and remove the IV-derived heuristics. That heuristics is
quite dubious because every variable with PHI in header of integral or pointer
type is seen as IV, so in the first basic block we match
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> loop-ch currently does analysis using ranger for all loops to identify
> candidates and then follows by phase where headers are duplicated (which
> breaks SSA and ranger). The second stage does more analysis (to see how
> many BBs we want to
Hi,
loop-ch currently does analysis using ranger for all loops to identify
candidates and then follows by phase where headers are duplicated (which
breaks SSA and ranger). The second stage does more analysis (to see how
many BBs we want to duplicate) but can't use ranger and thus misses
