Please discard the previous one. This is the right one:
David
Index: tree-pretty-print.c
===
--- tree-pretty-print.c (revision 174424)
+++ tree-pretty-print.c (working copy)
@@ -3013,3 +3013,36 @@
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Please discard the previous one. This is the right one:
See also Honzas comments (on the wrong patch presumably ;)).
+ if (node)
+fprintf (dump_file, \n;; Function %s (%s, funcdef_no=%d,
decl_uid = %d,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Please discard the previous one. This is the right one:
See also Honzas comments (on the wrong patch presumably ;)).
+ if (node)
+fprintf (dump_file, \n;; Function %s (%s, funcdef_no=%d,
decl_uid = %d,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The attached are two simple follow up patches
1) the first patch does some refactorization on function header
dumping (with more information printed)
2) the second patch cleans up some pass names. Part of the
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
This is the complete patch for pass name fixes (with test case changes).
This is ok if Honza thinks the profile pass names make more sense this
way.
Thanks,
Richard.
David
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:16 PM,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
wrote:
The attached are two simple follow up patches
1) the first patch does some refactorization on function header
dumping (with more
The new patch is attached. The test (c,c++,fortran, java, ada) is on going.
Thanks,
David
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:16 PM,
Honza, are you ok with the pass name change?
David
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
wrote:
This is the complete patch for pass name fixes (with test case changes).
This
Please discard the previous one. This is the right one:
David
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The new patch is attached. The test (c,c++,fortran, java, ada) is on going.
Thanks,
David
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Xinliang David Li
The attached are two simple follow up patches
1) the first patch does some refactorization on function header
dumping (with more information printed)
2) the second patch cleans up some pass names. Part of the cleanup
results from a previous discussion with Honza -- a) rename
'tree_profile_ipa'
This is the complete patch for pass name fixes (with test case changes).
David
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The attached are two simple follow up patches
1) the first patch does some refactorization on function header
dumping (with more
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The latest version that only exports 2 functions from passes.c.
Ok with ...
@@ -637,4 +637,8 @@ extern bool first_pass_instance;
/* Declare for plugins. */
extern void do_per_function_toporder (void (*) (void *),
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Ping. The link to the message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01303.html
I don't consider this an option handling patch. Patches adding whole new
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
+ if (is_enable)
+error (unrecognized option -fenable);
+ else
+error (unrecognized option -fdisable);
I think that should be fatal_error - Joseph?
No, all existing errors for unknown options are ordinary errors rather
The latest version that only exports 2 functions from passes.c.
David
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Joseph S. Myers
Ping. The link to the message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01303.html
Thanks,
David
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
David
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Ok to check in this
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Ping. The link to the message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01303.html
I don't consider this an option handling patch. Patches adding whole new
features involving new options should be reviewed by maintainers for the
part of
Ping.
David
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Ok to check in this one?
Thanks,
David
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011, David Li wrote:
+ error (Unrecognized option %s,
Ok to check in this one?
Thanks,
David
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011, David Li wrote:
+ error (Unrecognized option %s, is_enable ? -fenable :
-fdisable);
+ error (Unknown pass %s specified in %s,
+
davi...@google.com (David Li) writes:
-fdisable-tree-ccp1--- disable ccp1 for all functions
-fenable-tree-cunroll=1 --- enable complete unroll for the function
whose cgraphnode uid is 1
-fdisable-rtl-gcse2=1:100,300,400:1000 -- disable gcse2 for
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
davi...@google.com (David Li) writes:
-fdisable-tree-ccp1 --- disable ccp1 for all functions
-fenable-tree-cunroll=1 --- enable complete unroll for the function
whose cgraphnode uid is 1
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:10:24AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
davi...@google.com (David Li) writes:
-fdisable-tree-ccp1 --- disable ccp1 for all functions
-fenable-tree-cunroll=1 --- enable complete unroll
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:10:24AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
davi...@google.com (David Li) writes:
-fdisable-tree-ccp1 --- disable ccp1
In gcc, not all passes have user level control to turn it on/off, and
there is no way to flip on/off the pass for a subset of functions. I
implemented a generic option handling scheme in gcc to allow
disabling/enabling any gcc pass for any specified function(s). The
new options will be very
Thanks for the comment. Will fix those.
David
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011, David Li wrote:
+ error (Unrecognized option %s, is_enable ? -fenable :
-fdisable);
+ error (Unknown pass %s specified in %s,
+
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:37 PM, David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
In gcc, not all passes have user level control to turn it on/off, and
there is no way to flip on/off the pass for a subset of functions. I
implemented a generic option handling scheme in gcc to allow
disabling/enabling any
Will fix the Changelog, and add documentation.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:37 PM, David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
In gcc, not all passes have user level control to turn it on/off, and
there
27 matches
Mail list logo
