On 11/28/2011 12:28 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Ping? Anything else for this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02178.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01467.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01356.html
Not that I know of.
As far as I'm concerned you
Excellent. Thanks!
Ping? Anything else for this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02178.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01467.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01356.html
rl rs, mind sorting this in?
Oops. I'd been putting RL78 before RX for so long it seemed natural
(it's been powerpc so far, which doesn't come between rl78 and rx)
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===
-the SPU and M32C targets
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, DJ Delorie wrote:
Index: MAINTAINERS
===
rs6000 port Geoff Keating geo...@geoffk.org
rs6000 port David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com
rs6000 vector extns Aldy Hernandez
+# non-PIC targets always get an array-bounds error in
thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns
+function.o-warn = -Wno-error
Didn't we find another way to fix this? In any case this is
not present in your changelog.
Otherwise the port is looking ok.
r~
Didn't we find another way to fix this? In any case this is
not present in your changelog.
Yes, please ignore that. I do svn diff and then have to cut out all
the bits that aren't part of the base port itself.
(define_expand umulqihi3
[(set (match_operand:HI 0 register_operand)
(mult:HI (zero_extend:HI (match_operand:QI 1 register_operand))
(zero_extend:HI (match_operand:QI 2 register_operand]
0
)
Just delete it?
No, we actually have that insn.
On 11/04/2011 10:09 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
The problem I'm trying to solve with that is that there's only one
segment register (ES) so you only need to force an operand non-far if
*both* operands are far. Not sure if the function is implemented that
way, but I coded the expanders that way.
(define_expand zero_extendqihi2
[(set (match_operand:HI 0 nonimmediate_operand)
(zero_extend:HI (match_operand:QI 1 general_operand)))]
if (rl78_force_nonfar_2 (operands, gen_zero_extendqihi2))
DONE;
)
You should be able to simply rl78_nonfar_operand
(define_expand zero_extendqihi2
[(set (match_operand:HI 0 nonimmediate_operand)
(zero_extend:HI (match_operand:QI 1 general_operand)))]
if (rl78_force_nonfar_2 (operands, gen_zero_extendqihi2))
DONE;
)
You should be able to simply
11 matches
Mail list logo