> Reposting, okay to commit after testing on x86_64 if no regressions?
The patch wasn't correctly installed and the ChangeLog is incomplete.
* config/i386/f16cintrin.h: Contents moved from immintrin.h.
* config/i386/immintrin.h: Include f16cintrin.h.
* config.gcc (i[34567
Hello!
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 05:23:58PM -0500, Quentin Neill wrote:
> >> Interested parties should view these threads from three years ago:
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/threads.html#00145
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/threads.html#00174
> >>
> >> Testing on
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 05:23:58PM -0500, Quentin Neill wrote:
>> Interested parties should view these threads from three years ago:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/threads.html#00145
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 05:23:58PM -0500, Quentin Neill wrote:
> Interested parties should view these threads from three years ago:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/threads.html#00145
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/threads.html#00174
>
> Testing on x86_64, okay to commit if
Hi,
This patch moves f16c intrinsics out of immintrin.h into their own
header f16cintrin.h
Interested parties should view these threads from three years ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/threads.html#00145
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/threads.html#00174
Testing on x86_6
