On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:54 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])
(reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])) 0))
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit
address
in x32 mode. OK for trunk?
Do you perhaps have a testcase to
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:47 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch simply removes these two checks, as it seems they are
not needed. This also follows how other Pmode != ptr_mode targets.
2011-07-19 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/49780
*
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:47 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch simply removes these two checks, as it seems they are
not needed. This also follows how other Pmode != ptr_mode targets.
2011-07-19 Uros
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:42 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:47 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch simply removes these two checks, as it seems they are
not needed. This
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])
(reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])) 0)) omp_atomic1.f90:17
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 06:26:33PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF 159 [
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])
(reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])) 0))
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])
(reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])) 0))
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:49 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Sometimes, the compiler is really creative in inventing instructions:
(insn 47 46 49 7 (set (reg:SI 68 [ D.1686 ])
(subreg:SI (plus:SF (reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])
(reg:SF 159 [ D.1685 ])) 0))
Hi,
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit address
in x32 mode. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2011-07-18 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_legitimate_address_p): Support 32bit
address in x32 mode.
diff --git
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:39 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit address
in x32 mode. OK for trunk?
Do you perhaps have a testcase to help in analyzing the problem?
Uros.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:39 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit address
in x32 mode. OK for trunk?
Do you perhaps have a testcase to help in analyzing
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:48 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit address
in x32 mode. OK for trunk?
Do you perhaps have a testcase to help in analyzing the problem?
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49780
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:25 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit address
in x32 mode. OK for trunk?
Do you perhaps have a testcase to help in analyzing the problem?
See:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:25 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit address
in x32 mode. OK for trunk?
Do you perhaps have a testcase to help in analyzing
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:25 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
TARGET_MEM_REF only works on ptr_mode. This patch allows 32bit address
in x32 mode.
20 matches
Mail list logo